Skip To Content

Our Work

Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. Attorneys Successfully Defend Lender Against Mortgage Fraudster

A sophisticated mortgage fraudster commenced an action against a major lender alleging that a number of individuals actually defrauded the fraudster. The fraudster had previously been convicted of committing mortgage fraud, causing losses of millions of dollars to lenders.

After the fraudster was released from prison, she claimed that the mortgage on a property that was formerly owned by a company that she controlled should be discharged. If she were successful in this action, it would have cost Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C.’s client hundreds of thousands of dollars.

The plaintiff alleged that the scheme to defraud her involved numerous individuals and institutions. The plaintiff was not convicted of fraud related to this particular property or mortgage. This type of case often involves substantial and expensive discovery and a lengthy trial. Trials, of course, always involve risk. Thus, despite the plaintiff’s criminal history, the case could have been extremely expensive to defend.

Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. employed an aggressive pretrial discovery strategy, designed to break down what was believed to be yet another scheme to defraud a lender. The attorneys assigned to this matter are both former prosecutors who had the skillset to plan and execute this strategy.

The end game for Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. attorneys was to force a dismissal of the action or to elicit enough information to destroy the plaintiff’s credibility at a trial. Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C.  attorneys procured information from a criminal co-conspirator of the plaintiff and a law enforcement source to piece together the plaintiff’s entire scheme. Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. then served a “Notice to Admit” on the plaintiff’s counsel which required the plaintiff either to admit to the details of the scheme or deny the entire scheme in writing and under oath, thus forcing the plaintiff to admit her scheme to defraud or to commit perjury.

Instead of responding under oath, the plaintiff intentionally  defaulted, causing the case to be dismissed.

Colin Kaufman and an associate handled this matter under the supervision of managing partner Adam Leitman Bailey.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.