Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. Victoriously Defeats Motion to Dismiss Housing Court Eviction Proceeding
Representing the landlord of a building in the Bronx, Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. successfully defeated a motion to dismiss a nonpayment proceeding brought by tenants illegally operating a business out of the building.
Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. commenced a Supreme Court action against the tenants seeking equitable relief in the form of specific performance and an injunction. While that action remained pending, Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. thereafter commenced a nonpayment proceeding by filing a notice of petition and petition after serving the tenants with the requisite rent-demand for the tenants’ failure to pay rent to the landlord for months, leaving a significant balance in arrears.
The tenants, through counsel, moved to dismiss the nonpayment petition on the grounds that there is another action pending in Supreme Court between the same parties for the same cause of action. Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. immediately opposed the tenants’ motion to dismiss the nonpayment proceeding, arguing that the Supreme Court action and the nonpayment proceeding seek inherently different relief, and do not consist of the same cause of action, even though they may arise out of the same subject matter.
After the motion was fully briefed, the Court set the matter down for oral argument, where Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. zealously advocated for their client’s right to seek rent arrears in Civil Court, the proper forum for such claim.
The Court agreed with and adopted Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C.’s arguments in its decision, and ultimately denied the tenants’ motion to dismiss.
The landlord is represented by Dov Treiman and Carolyn Z. Rualo, all attorneys at Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. Mr. Treiman drafted the opposition papers.