Press Mentions

Back

Non-Disclosure Agreements Defend Against Fishing Expeditions

Habitat_logo

September 5, 2017

By Frank Lovece

Non-Disclosure Agreements Defend Against Fishing Expeditions

fish habitat


 

Sept. 5, 2017 — As courts grant increased access to building documents, board must prepare.

In 2011, [attorney] at [firm] at [address], began a lawsuit to gain access to board documents. [Attorney], who suspected the board of serious mismanagement, said she wanted to get the contact information of all unit-owners in the building and also extensive access to condo records, including monthly financial statements.

Three years later, after suing the board over a renovation dispute at his co-op at [address], [unit owner] discovered what seemed to be financial irregularities. “The building took on a very large facade renovation project [that] went 90 percent over budget with no coherent explanation,” says [unit owner], whose apartment was once the home of the late [celebrity restaurateur]. [Unit owner] began seeking access to pertinent co-op documents.

For boards in such situations, what are the risks and protections when granting access? “Many times, there are troublemakers who just want to get documents…to fuel a lawsuit,” observes Adam Leitman Bailey, an attorney at his eponymous firm. “On the other hand, it can be a good thing. After all, it’s a democracy. In that sense, who are [boards] to withhold documents?”

In the aftermath of the [attorney] and [unit owner] rulings, boards face the question of how they can allow increased access while still protecting the properties and residents through such devices as non-disclosure agreements (NDA). “The rights of an owner to review books and records must be balanced with maintaining the integrity of confidential information,” says [attorney], a principal at [firm] and board counsel for [residence].

The [attorney] case reiterated that condo unit-owners have the right to see financial reports, invoices, minutes of board meetings, and redacted legal invoices “so long as [it is] in good faith and for a valid purpose … at the managing agent’s office, during convenient weekday hours.” But now – citing precedent that said case law already allowed condo owners the right to make paper copies – the court affirmed a lower court’s ruling that said they also have the right to make “electronic copies.”

In addition, the ruling declared that condo unit-owners have the right to see lists of owners and their contact information, a right co-op shareholders already have. The court also said unit-owners could be required to sign a confidentiality agreement. While that ruling concerned only condos, the [unit owner] decision a few months later cited [attorney] as precedent to determine that co-op shareholders also are allowed to copy documents, which they never could before, and that boards can require a confidentiality agreement.

“I think the courts have been going in this direction for a while, allowing broader inspections, consistent with common law,” [attorney] of [firm], who represented the board of the [unit owner’s] condo.

Owners have had some inspection rights all along. “Historically what would happen is that a shareholder or unit-owner would make a request to see documents and submit a good-faith affidavit, which a board is entitled to ask for,” says [attorney]. “If the board believed there was no nefarious reason for reviewing the documents, an appointment would be made at the managing agent’s office and the documents would be reviewed. But until these cases, if a shareholder or unit-owner said, ‘We want photocopies made and to take them home with us,’ the answer would have been no.”

Such requests are unusual, according to [vice president] of [firm]. “Sometimes people feel they have an issue with their particular unit or floor or with the common space, and they want to see how the board voted,” he says. “Not many people do it to start lawsuits – it’s more for informational purposes.”

[President] of [firm], agrees. “I think most shareholders or unit-owners understand the ramifications if they were to disseminate information,” he says. “They generally just want to know what’s going on in their own building for knowledge reasons. If boards follow their legal counsel’s advice, have an NDA in place, and take appropriate minutes, then they should feel comfortable providing their owners the documented information requested. It’s still very new, though, so it’s going to be interesting to see how it goes.”

Original article

Related Attorneys

Adam Leitman Bailey

Related Content

“It is so nice to work with people who can become part of your work family. You are an amazing attorney, and always go above and beyond…” “Tears in my eyes as I thank God for you and your staff.” “I’ve learned so much and gained knowledge with a desire to work in the real estate department.” “We are finally at the point in time when I can say thank you so much for your phenomenal work. Your faith in this case was wise and the outcome matches.” “Hard work and risk pays off for closing” A Day in the Life of a Cooperative Transfer Agent: Saving the Closing Against Money Judgments ALBPC Wins $1.2 Million Judgment on Behalf of Small Brokerage Firm, Wins on Appeal, and Gets the Judgment Paid in Full within Months Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. Defeats Statute of Limitations Defense in Borrowers’ Motion to Dismiss Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C., Maximizes and Collects Surplus Money Funds for Condominium Board After Bank Foreclosure Sale of Condominium Unit Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. Prevails at Traverse Hearing, Defeats Borrower’s Motion to Vacate and Dismiss, and Wins Judgment for Lender ALBPC Prevails in a Complex Non-Primary Residence Case for 100-year-old Woman, Pro Bono ALBPC Prevails in a Complex Non-Primary Residence Case for 100-year-old Woman, Pro Bono ALBPC Prevails in a Complex Non-Primary Residence Case for 100-year-old Woman, Pro Bono Handling and Storing Hazardous Materials Brokers Win $1.2M In Six-Year-Long Commission Battle Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. Prevails at Traverse Hearing, Defeats Borrower’s Motion to Vacate and Dismiss, and Wins Judgment for Lender (Part I) Adam Leitman Bailey Presents at New York State Bar Association Advanced Real Estate Topics: “Advice from a Litigator” Christopher Halligan Speaks to the New York State Bar Association on Jury Trials in Landlord – Tenant Proceedings Adam Leitman Bailey Lectures for New York State Bar Association on Easements, Adverse Possession and Arcane Laws to Overcoming Building Obstacles Adam Leitman Bailey Guest Lecturer at New York Law School’s Landlord-Tenant Class NYSBA – Removing Real Estate Development Obstacles: Zoning, Restrictive Covenants, Easements, Adverse Possession and Boundary Disputes

Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C.

NEW YORK REAL ESTATE ATTORNEYS