Case Studies


Board Collects Common Charges Without Judicial Intervention by Novel Agreement and Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure

With the recent economic downturn, condominium boards have been plagued by unit owner common charge defaults. With fewer unit owners paying their common charges, Boards are faced with the prospect of increasing common charges in order to collect the deficit from those unit owners in good standing– unless they can collect the unpaid common charges from the delinquent unit owners.

Most Boards who attempt to collect common charges from delinquent unit owners are faced with essentially three choices – enter into a payment plan with the defaulting unit owner, sue for money damages, or foreclose. The problem with the payment plan option is that when a unit owner misses a payment, the Board must start an action, which takes time and money. This is really just delaying the inevitable. If a Board decides to go straight to court (small claims or otherwise), the Board may succeed in getting a judgment on the outstanding common charges, but would have to commence consecutive actions in order to keep collecting the common charges as they continue to accrue. Also, collection on the judgment(s) may be impossible. This starts a cycle of continuous legal bills and unpaid common charges. The third option, foreclosure, is the clear choice of these three options because, theoretically, a Board will be made whole by the sale of the unit. However, especially with the recent regulations creating more red tape for foreclosure proceedings, this can be a long process.

Our office has created a fourth option, which blends the benefits of the three standard options.

Two years ago, the Board of Managers of a three-tower 250-unit condominium retained our firm and advised that a large percentage of the unit owners were delinquent in common charge payments. The Board further advised that prior counsel had employed a collection plan involving payment plans and suits for money judgment. Many unit owners already had numerous judgments against them, but no money had actually been collected.

We realized that we needed a new collection method that would keep us out of court, incentivize unit owners to make payments, and rid the condominium of those unit owners who had no way of keeping up with their common charge obligations going into the future.

The result was an agreement that included a payment plan secured by a deed in lieu of foreclosure (“DILF”). The DILF is executed simultaneously with the agreement and held in escrow by our firm during the term of the payment plan. The DILF is released to the Board for recording if a payment is missed and not cured within 10 days. Also included in the agreement is a Notice to Quit, which, as part of the agreement, is deemed to have been duly and properly served upon the defaulting unit owner on the 15th day succeeding the date of the recording of the DILF, and which further obligates the unit owner to vacate the unit on the 27th day after recording. Therefore, if a unit owner defaults on its obligations under the payment plan (and does not timely cure), not only will the Board become the record owner of the unit, but will gain possession via the Notice to Quit as soon as 27 days later.

Essentially, the agreement tests a delinquent unit owner to determine whether he or she can catch up on their unpaid common charges under the payment plan and become a unit owner in good standing. If they can – the common charges are paid in full and the unit owner keeps his or her unit. If the unit owner cannot – the release of the DILF shortcuts the entire foreclosure process and rids the condominium of a unit owner who cannot keep up with his or her payment obligations.

The Board was able to collect most of the unpaid common charges without incurring significant legal expense or spending years in court, and the rate of common charge delinquency has dropped substantially. By utilizing this method, the Board avoided raising common charges for all unit owners.

Related Attorneys

Adam Leitman Bailey

Related Content

With “Professionalism, Support, and Persistence”, ALBPC Works Hard to Keep Tax Benefits for Client “It is so nice to work with people who can become part of your work family. You are an amazing attorney, and always go above and beyond…” “Tears in my eyes as I thank God for you and your staff.” “I’ve learned so much and gained knowledge with a desire to work in the real estate department.” “We are finally at the point in time when I can say thank you so much for your phenomenal work. Your faith in this case was wise and the outcome matches.” Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. Successfully Defends Foreclosing Plaintiff’s Action against Motions to Vacate and Dismiss Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. Defeats Standing Defense and Wins Summary Judgment for Foreclosing Plaintiff ALBPC Obtains Condo Deposit Refunds for Two Clients Totaling Over $10 Million, Including Interest Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. Assists with Drafting the Foreclosure Motion Templates Promulgated for Use By Administrative Order 356/17 Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. Provides Free Closings For All Employees ALBPC Prevails in a Complex Non-Primary Residence Case for 100-year-old Woman, Pro Bono ALBPC Prevails in a Complex Non-Primary Residence Case for 100-year-old Woman, Pro Bono ALBPC Prevails in a Complex Non-Primary Residence Case for 100-year-old Woman, Pro Bono Handling and Storing Hazardous Materials Brokers Win $1.2M In Six-Year-Long Commission Battle Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. Prevails at Traverse Hearing, Defeats Borrower’s Motion to Vacate and Dismiss, and Wins Judgment for Lender (Part I) Adam Leitman Bailey Presents at New York State Bar Association Advanced Real Estate Topics: “Advice from a Litigator” Christopher Halligan Speaks to the New York State Bar Association on Jury Trials in Landlord – Tenant Proceedings Adam Leitman Bailey Lectures for New York State Bar Association on Easements, Adverse Possession and Arcane Laws to Overcoming Building Obstacles Adam Leitman Bailey Guest Lecturer at New York Law School’s Landlord-Tenant Class NYSBA – Removing Real Estate Development Obstacles: Zoning, Restrictive Covenants, Easements, Adverse Possession and Boundary Disputes

Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C.